South Carolina Dispensary

Round Cup Mat ,
Demand for prohibition
Heath as well as Kinnard (1980) analyzes a background as well as proclivity of a prohibitionists in South Carolina as well as a five referendums upon breach in between 1892 as well as 1940. After a prohibitionists won a 1892 referendum, Ben Tillman convinced a state authorised body to adopt a hospital system, whereby a state received a increase from a sale of wine as well as tightly controlled it during a same time. Although a breach forces won subsequent referendums, a state was demure to close down a hospital complement since of a income it generated. Religious reasons as well as vicinity to Charleston (the further divided a country, a more likely it was to opinion for prohibition), were a dual vital reasons for supporting breach in South Carolina.
Prohibitionist sentiment, supported by Baptist as well as Methodist ministers grew rapidly in a 1880s. In 1889 a check proposing breach of alcoholic libation was introduced in a S.C. House, as well as failed to pass by a domain of usually 8 votes. In 1890 a House upheld a magnitude that was in conclusion degraded in a Senate. Most observers suspicion South Carolina would have turn a ry state if not for a appearance of a hospital system. After Tillman as well as his poor rancher bloc (ool hat boys) came to power in 1890, a hospital complement became his answer to a wine question. The South Carolina General Assembly determined a state hospital complement in a rush opinion during 5:30 A.M. upon a last day of a session, December 24, 1892. The sentiments of a ets, or anti-prohibitionists, was that a complement was better than prohibition, as wine was still legal, since a rys, or prohibitionists, saw a complement as a step towards prohibition, though outright breach is what they in conclusion wanted; neither side was happy with a new law.
The Dispensary in operation
The corner a state combined was complete; indiscriminate as well as retail sales were controlled by a hospital complement through a state board of control, that consisted of a governor, administrator general, as well as attorney general. Day-to-day administration was in a hands of a state government official allocated by a governor. The government official was charged with procuring all liquors that were to be subsequently bottled by a state hospital as well as sole to county dispensaries. Preference was to be since to local brewers as well as distillers. Liquor bottled by a state hospital was a usually wine to be sole legally in South Carolina. From 1893 to 1900 a bottles used by a hospital had an embossed pattern featuring a palmetto tree with crossed logs under a bottom of a trunk, as well as from 1900-1907 an overlaying as well as intertwining S,C, as well as D cript pattern transposed a tree design. This was often since prohibitionists objected to having such a prominent state pitch as a palmetto tree embossed upon wine bottles. The script, or monogram pattern remained upon hospital bottles until a end of a complement in 1907.
End of a Dispensary
The crime of a Dispensary as a domestic appurtenance dumbfounded Progressive era reformers, along with a church component that longed for finish prohibition. The General Assembly upheld a Bryce law in 1904 that authorised for counties to choose either they would concede for a sale of alcohol. Many of a Upstate counties voted to anathema a sale of ethanol as well as it was not as well prolonged prior to a General Assembly discussed a viability of a Dispensary itself. In 1907, a Carey-Cothran law was upheld that abolished a State Dispensary as well as provided for a establishment of dispensaries in each county that chose to remain wet.
The counties that operated dispensaries grew prosperous from a revenues generated by a sale of alcohol, But prohibitionists sentiment was irresistible as well as in 1915, a dry counties sought to end a sale of ethanol via a state. A referendum held in a state upon a subject of breach saw dual to a single await from a electorate as well as a General Assembly subsequently enacted a law in 1916 to anathema a sale of ethanol as well as limit a importation from another state.
Bottle varieties
For a many part, all that stays of a S.C. Dispensary have been a (mostly empty) bottles that were done simply to enclose alcoholic beverages to be sole as well as consumed, with no regard to a aesthetics of a bottle or design. The bottles have been treasured by collectors not for their beauty of pattern or color, though more as a link to an appealing era in history. Today, many bottle collectors enthusiastically seek S.C. Dispensary bottles, that have turn sincerely scarce in terms of common varieties. A couple of varieties have been awfully rare as well as have been worth many thousands of dollars to avid collectors willing to compensate a price for them , opening pot .
The many common sort of S.C. Dispensary bottle is a o-jo flask, that is a flask with prosaic panels front as well as back, rounded shoulders, as well as a rounding towards a base. These were done as well as used via a life of a hospital system. Another sort of flask, a kinship flask, was used until a turn of a century, as well as none were done with a monogram design. Unlike a jo-jo, that all gimlet a fable C Dispensary, unions gimlet both this as well as outh Carolina Dispensary. Half-pint, pint, as well as a single quart cylindrical bottles were additionally done as well as used. Stoneware jugs in half-gallon as well as gallon sizes were additionally made, a little done from clay with a palmetto tree as well as fable drawn by hand. There have been other non-typical bottle types, as well as a little bottles that were not embossed, being noted as a hospital item by label only. A much sought after item is a two-ounce capacity commemoration commemorative hospital bottle done for a South Carolina Interstate as well as West Indian Exposition in Charleston, S.C. that was held in 1901-1902. With different potion tone varieties, potion manufacturers, as well as pattern nuances, there have been many varieties of S.C. Dispensary bottles to be collected. Each S.C. Dispensary bottle is unique due to being blown in a mold by a glassblower, as a Owens AR automatic bottle-making appurtenance was not yet in widespread make use of , potion tumblers .
Notes
^ A prejudiced difference to this is a state-run corner upon sure alcoholic beverages in a state of Idaho, a Idaho State Liquor Dispensary.
^ Eubanks 1950
References
Ball, William Watts (1932). The State That Forgot; South Carolina's Surrender to Democracy. The Bobbs-Merrill Company. pp. 243259. 
Niels Christensen, Jr. "The State Dispensaries of South Carolina," Annals of a American Academy of Political as well as Social Science, vol. 32, (Nov., 1908), pp. 75-85 in JSTOR
John Evans Eubanks. Ben Tillman's Baby: The Dispensary System of South Carolina, 1892-1915. (1950)
Huggins, Phillip Kenneth (1971). The South Carolina Dispensary; A Bottle Collector's Atlas as well as History of a System. Sandlapper Press, Inc.. ISBN 0-87844-006-2. 
Heath, Frederick M. as well as Kinard, Harriet H. "Prohibition in South Carolina, 1880-1940: an Overview." Proceedings of a South Carolina Historical Association 1980: 118-132. Issn: 0361-6207
Francis Butler Simkins. The Tillman Movement in South Carolina. (Duke U.P. 1926) ch 8 online edition
External links
SC Statehouse Biography of Governor Ben Tillman
SCIway Biography of Governor Ben Tillman
ASME Manufacturing of bottles
SC Dispensary bottles
Categories: History of South Carolina